TAMRON 100-400 LENS REVIEW | GREAT for Sports, Wildlife, Nature & Photographers On A Budget




This is a REVIEW of the Tamron 100-400mm zoom lens.

Download sample RAW files
Zoo Photos http://bit.ly/2HsymcZ
Brick Photos http://bit.ly/2qANcmW

TAMRON 70-200 2.8 G2 Real World Review https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0Pb37PGa2E

Download MyGearVault https://mygearvault.com/#download

source

Your reaction?
Cute Cute
0
Cute
Fail Fail
0
Fail
Geeky Geeky
0
Geeky
Lol Lol
0
Lol
Love Love
0
Love
Omg Omg
0
Omg
Win Win
0
Win
Wtf Wtf
0
Wtf

Comments 28

  1. Jarod, when you review Sony camera body's…don't you think it would be valid to mention that Sony does not repair there own camera's…little or no customer support…that's a deal breaker.

  2. Which would you recommend more, this Tamron 100-400 or Nikon 300 AF-S F4? Looking for sharp images on birds and wildlife on my Nikon D7200. Thanks in advance.

  3. I bought that lens two months ago and is a great lens for my Canon EOS 1Ds Mk II, using one shot AF, but when I used ai servo AF it was good for storks in the day but it was not really reactive in a soccer match in a sunny day in full focus (1,50 m to infinite), the first part I was working with that lens, the second part of the match (cloudy) I used the old Sigma 120-400 OS and it worked better, even if optically is worst, in short distances focused very well. I did no used the limit focus on the Tamron, maybe in that circumstances it works better, I didn't make any adjust via "tap in console" and I don't know if I can get better results. What I know about Ai-servo focus is that it works better in standard mode than fast one.

    In a hall of an small city, it was hard to focus well in Ai Servo (too slow) for rolling skate, the Sigma won that match. So the difference between f5.6 and f6.3 is bigger than you can spect (even using a 5d Mk IV).

    Check results here https://www.flickr.com/photos/xaviplateria/albums/72157694204723474

    In my flickr page you may see some other tests of that lens.

  4. Could you do a comparison to see just how much (quality) you'd lose against Nikon's 200-500? Would be an interesting comparison to see which is more priceworthy.

  5. I was thinking of getting the Tamron 100-400 or the Sigma 100-400 for my nikon d5300 so i got the Sigma 150-600 C, i love the extra reach for small birds.
    Now i want the Tamron 70-200mm their first lens without VC, its cost 550€ and the other would be the sigma 70-200mm with OS but it costs 850€.
    I really would love to get a version with VS/OS/VR but its costs too much, what would you say should i get the Tamron 70-200SP without VC or buckle up and get the sigma wit OS, the 300€ difference i would but aside to upgrade my cam from D5300 to D500.

  6. Saw your review of the sigma 100-400 and now this one.
    So the FroNation wants to know which one do we get? Sig or Tam…I’ve got both of them in my Adorama wish list waiting for an answer to move either one into the cart & hit the buy button.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

log in

reset password

Back to
log in